Comments on: The next generation of Snapdragon processors will be sampled next month

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 31 May 2011 09:37:00 +0000

the battery life also depends on how you use and operating system the application you use the main fact is the operating system like 2.3 is less use of battery

By: ap

ap — Tue, 31 May 2011 08:08:00 +0000

unlikely….it’s going to be powered by Sammy’s own Quad core chipset with PowerVR GPU (more likely)….

By: ap

ap — Tue, 31 May 2011 06:34:00 +0000

I hope they put in the Adreno 320 GPU, instead of 225…. :D

By: Sammy Lover

Sammy Lover — Tue, 31 May 2011 06:16:00 +0000

lol my GS III is gonna be powered by Snapdragon quad core 2.5 GHz :D

By: warisz00r

warisz00r — Tue, 31 May 2011 05:20:00 +0000

@4a4b7ee2b8148c7a329c86eb01939194:disqus What YOU don’t understand is that with more speed, more things can be done in less time and the the processors can put itself into low power mode more often. That’s how faster/multi-core SoCs can positively affect battery life.

By: Joon Ho Kim

Joon Ho Kim — Tue, 31 May 2011 03:59:00 +0000

@4a4b7ee2b8148c7a329c86eb01939194:disqus For example, did battery life get worse going from Samsung Galaxy S to Samsung Galaxy S II? Did it get worse from Desire Z to Sensation? Did it get worse from iPad 1 to iPad 2? Not saying it all depends on the CPU, but still, it affects the battery life.

By: Guest

Guest — Tue, 31 May 2011 02:36:00 +0000

I seriously don’t think they’ll release a phone with these new processors and have shorter battery life usage than it already is now, everyone knows smartphones battery life sucks, even iPhone. I’m pretty sure they can’t be more stupid than they already are now.

By: Megaman

Megaman — Tue, 31 May 2011 02:19:00 +0000

Intel’s Ivy Bridge will be 22nm and a totally different architecture. And they are currently on 32nm chips for atom processors. For Intel 32nm is their equivalent to 28nm for ARM. It’s like going from 45nm to 40nm. The difference is very very small between them; and, with the Intel architecture advantage (in outright performance if not battery life necessarily) it should be kind of a wash between them.

By: Nishank

Nishank — Tue, 31 May 2011 02:00:00 +0000

Love @a0af29128846e44a969626effed62d38:disqus ’s comment :D more powerrrr!!! (and a bigger battery.. just in case the 65% reduction doesn’t cut it :P )

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 31 May 2011 01:33:00 +0000

With that processing power comes more power hungry screens and programs. 75% reduction means little to nothing. What do you not understand?