<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung might also unveil a new tablet at the May 3 event in London</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-might-also-unveil-a-new-tablet-at-the-may-3-event-in-london/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-might-also-unveil-a-new-tablet-at-the-may-3-event-in-london/</link>
	<description>GSMArena Blog: Geeks at large is a project of GSMArena.com team, discussing all things high-tech - mobile phones, computers, digcams and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayhan Syed</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-might-also-unveil-a-new-tablet-at-the-may-3-event-in-london/comment-page-1/#comment-622497</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayhan Syed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 02:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=31283#comment-622497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am totally confused. People have been telling me alternate definitions of hd display. does it require 300+ ppi fo phones or is it just 1080  pixels across or whatever. I got the hd info from  two articles.
http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/13/lg-renames-optimus-lte-to-optimus-true-hd-lte-disses-samsungs/
the first article said that a true hd 1080p display was created by toshiba and how a 490+ ppi would be needed for it. And it links to the other which talks about the 6.1 inch tablet i spoke of before that did it.
http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/20/toshiba-shows-off-6-inch-tablet-display-with-498ppi-resolution/ ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am totally confused. People have been telling me alternate definitions of hd display. does it require 300+ ppi fo phones or is it just 1080  pixels across or whatever. I got the hd info from  two articles.<br />
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/13/lg-renames-optimus-lte-to-optimus-true-hd-lte-disses-samsungs/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/13/lg-renames-optimus-lte-to-optimus-true-hd-lte-disses-samsungs/</a><br />
the first article said that a true hd 1080p display was created by toshiba and how a 490+ ppi would be needed for it. And it links to the other which talks about the 6.1 inch tablet i spoke of before that did it.<br />
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/20/toshiba-shows-off-6-inch-tablet-display-with-498ppi-resolution/ " rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/20/toshiba-shows-off-6-inch-tablet-display-with-498ppi-resolution/ </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-might-also-unveil-a-new-tablet-at-the-may-3-event-in-london/comment-page-1/#comment-621067</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 04:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=31283#comment-621067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to define Retina Display ?
Distance from device + Ability of human retina to distinguish pixels ,
On iPhone 4 or 4S u need more than 20% than what they currently have in order to really use the term &quot;retina display&quot;
because we use phones little closer compared to distance we maintain while using tablets.

Tablets : They need around 260-270 ppi in order to crystal clear display to human eye.

For Example :
Galaxy Note is 5.3-inch 800 x 1280 pixels 285pi and we can easily call it retina display since distance we hold it (considering note as tablet).

I think 260-270 enough no need 300 or 400 ppi.

What i meant is , if u put more than that its just resource hog because our eyes cant distinguish beyond that extent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to define Retina Display ?<br />
Distance from device + Ability of human retina to distinguish pixels ,<br />
On iPhone 4 or 4S u need more than 20% than what they currently have in order to really use the term &#8220;retina display&#8221;<br />
because we use phones little closer compared to distance we maintain while using tablets.</p>
<p>Tablets : They need around 260-270 ppi in order to crystal clear display to human eye.</p>
<p>For Example :<br />
Galaxy Note is 5.3-inch 800 x 1280 pixels 285pi and we can easily call it retina display since distance we hold it (considering note as tablet).</p>
<p>I think 260-270 enough no need 300 or 400 ppi.</p>
<p>What i meant is , if u put more than that its just resource hog because our eyes cant distinguish beyond that extent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wwoo</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-might-also-unveil-a-new-tablet-at-the-may-3-event-in-london/comment-page-1/#comment-620916</link>
		<dc:creator>Wwoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=31283#comment-620916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Samsung_Fanboy:disqus Christopher Schinker i think you are an idiot, pip does have to do when you calculate it relative to the screen size.As @google-328e2620074188087f2c2c3d87d3d13e:disqus  said i think he meant that much pip for a 10.1 inch screen. Don&#039;t know where you got all that from...?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Samsung_Fanboy:disqus Christopher Schinker i think you are an idiot, pip does have to do when you calculate it relative to the screen size.As @google-328e2620074188087f2c2c3d87d3d13e:disqus  said i think he meant that much pip for a 10.1 inch screen. Don&#8217;t know where you got all that from&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayhan Syed</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-might-also-unveil-a-new-tablet-at-the-may-3-event-in-london/comment-page-1/#comment-620907</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayhan Syed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=31283#comment-620907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well Chris i probably was misinformed i will then conceed. I was probably confused because this article writes that toshiba managed to make a 6.1 inch display true hd
http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/13/lg-renames-optimus-lte-to-optimus-true-hd-lte-disses-samsungs/  and it links to this article of those 
http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/20/toshiba-shows-off-6-inch-tablet-display-with-498ppi-resolution/ the former says that the tablet made has true 1080 hd]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well Chris i probably was misinformed i will then conceed. I was probably confused because this article writes that toshiba managed to make a 6.1 inch display true hd<br />
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/13/lg-renames-optimus-lte-to-optimus-true-hd-lte-disses-samsungs/ " rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/13/lg-renames-optimus-lte-to-optimus-true-hd-lte-disses-samsungs/ </a> and it links to this article of those <br />
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/20/toshiba-shows-off-6-inch-tablet-display-with-498ppi-resolution/ the" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/20/toshiba-shows-off-6-inch-tablet-display-with-498ppi-resolution/ the</a> former says that the tablet made has true 1080 hd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Schinker</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-might-also-unveil-a-new-tablet-at-the-may-3-event-in-london/comment-page-1/#comment-620891</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Schinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=31283#comment-620891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dude, on a 50&quot; TV Full HD looks super clear... Apple having more pixels than that on a 10&quot; tablet is just a marketing trick, to get people thinking, they have something special, even though your eye cannot see the difference, you brains still tell you, like you could, because you know, there is more, but you cannot see it... A resolution bigger than Full HD is complete nonsense on a 10&quot; tablet...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, on a 50&#8243; TV Full HD looks super clear&#8230; Apple having more pixels than that on a 10&#8243; tablet is just a marketing trick, to get people thinking, they have something special, even though your eye cannot see the difference, you brains still tell you, like you could, because you know, there is more, but you cannot see it&#8230; A resolution bigger than Full HD is complete nonsense on a 10&#8243; tablet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Schinker</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-might-also-unveil-a-new-tablet-at-the-may-3-event-in-london/comment-page-1/#comment-620889</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Schinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=31283#comment-620889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, that is 1080p, 1080 stands for the number of vertical lines and the p for progressive scan! That is 1080p, dont know, what you are talking about, probably Retina, but not 1080p^^

Why dont you look up what 1080p means, before you tell everyone your wrong info...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is 1080p, 1080 stands for the number of vertical lines and the p for progressive scan! That is 1080p, dont know, what you are talking about, probably Retina, but not 1080p^^</p>
<p>Why dont you look up what 1080p means, before you tell everyone your wrong info&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Schinker</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-might-also-unveil-a-new-tablet-at-the-may-3-event-in-london/comment-page-1/#comment-620888</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Schinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=31283#comment-620888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe you should get a new lolipop you small child.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should get a new lolipop you small child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Schinker</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-might-also-unveil-a-new-tablet-at-the-may-3-event-in-london/comment-page-1/#comment-620887</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Schinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=31283#comment-620887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@google-328e2620074188087f2c2c3d87d3d13e:disqus Total nonsense... 1080p has nothing to do with ppi. 1080p means at least 1920x1080 pixels on the display and the p in 1080p stands for progressive scan, which is the way the picture is displayed, unlike interlaced pictures, like 1080i. If you buy a 55&quot; Full HD TV you will never have anything close to 441ppi, dont know, where you got that from...?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@google-328e2620074188087f2c2c3d87d3d13e:disqus Total nonsense&#8230; 1080p has nothing to do with ppi. 1080p means at least 1920&#215;1080 pixels on the display and the p in 1080p stands for progressive scan, which is the way the picture is displayed, unlike interlaced pictures, like 1080i. If you buy a 55&#8243; Full HD TV you will never have anything close to 441ppi, dont know, where you got that from&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayhan Syed</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-might-also-unveil-a-new-tablet-at-the-may-3-event-in-london/comment-page-1/#comment-620878</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayhan Syed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 15:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=31283#comment-620878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[no I&#039;m saying you need 1 ppi of 489 to have a 1080p screen, i agree that 1920 x 1080 results in a 218 ppi, but that is not 1080p. Toshiba got 1080p with 2560 x 1440 which is a higher resolution but they were only did so with a 6.1 inch screen. One needs a way larger screen for 1080p. That mean a cpu probably equivalent to tegra 4 or an S5 at least]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no I&#8217;m saying you need 1 ppi of 489 to have a 1080p screen, i agree that 1920 x 1080 results in a 218 ppi, but that is not 1080p. Toshiba got 1080p with 2560 x 1440 which is a higher resolution but they were only did so with a 6.1 inch screen. One needs a way larger screen for 1080p. That mean a cpu probably equivalent to tegra 4 or an S5 at least</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viking</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-might-also-unveil-a-new-tablet-at-the-may-3-event-in-london/comment-page-1/#comment-620845</link>
		<dc:creator>Viking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 06:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=31283#comment-620845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you thought that next gen display might be 1080p OLED display!? It would be revolutionary!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you thought that next gen display might be 1080p OLED display!? It would be revolutionary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
