<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nokia revises its awkward device naming convention, it was about time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.gsmarena.com/nokia-revises-its-awkward-device-naming-convention-we-sigh-with-relief/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/nokia-revises-its-awkward-device-naming-convention-we-sigh-with-relief/</link>
	<description>GSMArena Blog: Geeks at large is a project of GSMArena.com team, discussing all things high-tech - mobile phones, computers, digcams and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abc</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/nokia-revises-its-awkward-device-naming-convention-we-sigh-with-relief/comment-page-2/#comment-214765</link>
		<dc:creator>Abc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=17974#comment-214765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i remember buying nokia phone, ooh i want nokia dual sim, o yem that could be c1 01, no no ser its c1 dash WTFFFFFFF!!!!!!!!!!!, well at least on when you buy hTC--- YOU ARE THE NEXT SENSATION loool]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i remember buying nokia phone, ooh i want nokia dual sim, o yem that could be c1 01, no no ser its c1 dash WTFFFFFFF!!!!!!!!!!!, well at least on when you buy hTC&#8212; YOU ARE THE NEXT SENSATION loool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yes</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/nokia-revises-its-awkward-device-naming-convention-we-sigh-with-relief/comment-page-2/#comment-214654</link>
		<dc:creator>yes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=17974#comment-214654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nokia 1000 series – Ultrabasic series
Nokia 2000 series – Basic series
Nokia 3000 series – Expression series
Nokia 5000 series – Active series
Nokia 6000 series – Classic Business series
Nokia 7000 series – Fashion and Experimental series
Nokia 8000 series – Premium series
Nokia 9000 series – Communicator series (discontinued)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nokia 1000 series – Ultrabasic series<br />
Nokia 2000 series – Basic series<br />
Nokia 3000 series – Expression series<br />
Nokia 5000 series – Active series<br />
Nokia 6000 series – Classic Business series<br />
Nokia 7000 series – Fashion and Experimental series<br />
Nokia 8000 series – Premium series<br />
Nokia 9000 series – Communicator series (discontinued)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenBelt</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/nokia-revises-its-awkward-device-naming-convention-we-sigh-with-relief/comment-page-2/#comment-203320</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenBelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=17974#comment-203320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want Nokia 420]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want Nokia 420</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabster</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/nokia-revises-its-awkward-device-naming-convention-we-sigh-with-relief/comment-page-2/#comment-196310</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=17974#comment-196310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[apple has the best naming, 1,2,3,4 (3gs was the oddity but i think it was there to finish the gap between iphone and ipod touch)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apple has the best naming, 1,2,3,4 (3gs was the oddity but i think it was there to finish the gap between iphone and ipod touch)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azimullah hassan</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/nokia-revises-its-awkward-device-naming-convention-we-sigh-with-relief/comment-page-2/#comment-190572</link>
		<dc:creator>azimullah hassan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=17974#comment-190572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When will Elop die?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will Elop die?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnDevil86</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/nokia-revises-its-awkward-device-naming-convention-we-sigh-with-relief/comment-page-2/#comment-189024</link>
		<dc:creator>AnDevil86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 05:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=17974#comment-189024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ haha..i suppose nokia is doing this because they expect the company would go down and die when nokia 999 is released.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> haha..i suppose nokia is doing this because they expect the company would go down and die when nokia 999 is released.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wawa</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/nokia-revises-its-awkward-device-naming-convention-we-sigh-with-relief/comment-page-2/#comment-188930</link>
		<dc:creator>wawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 04:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=17974#comment-188930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nokia 999 and a half? or Nokia 1K?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nokia 999 and a half? or Nokia 1K?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waver</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/nokia-revises-its-awkward-device-naming-convention-we-sigh-with-relief/comment-page-2/#comment-188928</link>
		<dc:creator>waver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 04:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=17974#comment-188928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah, nice one, i like Nokia 969]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, nice one, i like Nokia 969</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/nokia-revises-its-awkward-device-naming-convention-we-sigh-with-relief/comment-page-2/#comment-188708</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=17974#comment-188708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As long as they don&#039;t start putting stupid names to them, I&#039;m happy. (I like the N-series, though)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as they don&#8217;t start putting stupid names to them, I&#8217;m happy. (I like the N-series, though)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayant Y9</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/nokia-revises-its-awkward-device-naming-convention-we-sigh-with-relief/comment-page-2/#comment-188552</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayant Y9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=17974#comment-188552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[high time!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>high time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
