Comments on: Microsoft releases One Note 1.3 for iOS, makes a special version for the iPad

By: Jay Lim

Jay Lim — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:05:00 +0000

if anything, this proves to me that Microsoft admitting that iOS is the dominant platform. While they develop for iOS, they are running the #DROIDRAGE campaign showing us where they believe where they will get their marketshare from.

By: Tomar

Tomar — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:51:00 +0000

This is the bomb dog

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:42:00 +0000

iAds are contract based and need huge investment right before they start it while google ads dont need that much expenditure and iAds are just mobile ads not seen on windows or macs and also limited to iOS.

Android is shipping more volumes and who is gonna put money on iAds ?
instead approach google with cheaper and wide-spreaded alternative.

By: Michael Schwartz

Michael Schwartz — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:03:00 +0000

Yes, which they “sold” to former executives and relatives. Real evidence has never been provided but we like to “pretend” it’s so so we don’t disturb the pink wet dreams of iFanboys.

Truth is MS and Apple both develop software for each other.
Apple has dumped a whole MACos to join the Microsoft’s platform of choice (x86)
In spite of steve vs. steve b*tchfights MS is the only “competitor” Apple didn’t sue. And neither did MS in spite of iOS UI looking like a windows phone: http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/htc-verizon-imagio-windows-phone-6.5-01-r3media-322×499.jpg

Oh, and let’s not forget the mac vs pc ads that were bloated with so many lies that MS could have scraped them off the face of the earth if they wanted to.

By: Michael Schwartz

Michael Schwartz — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:54:00 +0000

Yes, like why didn’t they work with google in the first place instead of implementing a half baked system. And who in the world would use iAds with the prices they ask for.

I too think they should totally give up on iAds, clearly Apple doesn’t have the experience to make it work.

By: tvgadget

tvgadget — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:32:00 +0000

why use ad supported buggy slow half baked apps when u can get ad free full version of apps for a small price? i mean these apps cost money to make right??developers need to get paid right??

By: tvgadget

tvgadget — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:26:00 +0000

microsoft had 150 million dollars worth of shares in 1997 which they sold out in 2001…MS doesnt own any apple shares now..

By: Michael Schwartz

Michael Schwartz — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:38:00 +0000

iSay, that’s an outrageous amount for this type of app.

Poor iOS users can’t get ad-supported apps since Apple themselves admitted iAds is a failure: http://www.afterdawn.com/news/article.cfm/2011/12/13/apple_reduces_rates_to_attract_more_mobile_advertisers

By: Vince

Vince — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:33:00 +0000

poor android :( I feel pity for android users not getting this app…they might get it next month :)….in the Amazon Market xD poor users

By: Steve Gates

Steve Gates — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:18:00 +0000

microsoft: supporting apple, ever since they own it (1998)