<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Humorous Samsung ad touts the enterprise security of its SAFE branded Galaxy S III and Note II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.gsmarena.com/humorous-samsung-ad-touts-the-enterprise-security-of-their-safe-branded-galaxy-s-iii-and-note-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/humorous-samsung-ad-touts-the-enterprise-security-of-their-safe-branded-galaxy-s-iii-and-note-ii/</link>
	<description>GSMArena Blog: Geeks at large is a project of GSMArena.com team, discussing all things high-tech - mobile phones, computers, digcams and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 05:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pumpkin King</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/humorous-samsung-ad-touts-the-enterprise-security-of-their-safe-branded-galaxy-s-iii-and-note-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-704118</link>
		<dc:creator>Pumpkin King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 06:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=43650#comment-704118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jealousy hurts bad it seems]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jealousy hurts bad it seems</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sathaha</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/humorous-samsung-ad-touts-the-enterprise-security-of-their-safe-branded-galaxy-s-iii-and-note-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-704094</link>
		<dc:creator>Sathaha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 04:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=43650#comment-704094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be specific i just brought into your attention what was in the article.
BB going down??? no. I believe its more like; they were having a fun ride on a Ford but android and iOS came on a Lamborghini and overtook them. They were having the fun just like Nokia until they realized that somebody has overtaken!!!
Having said that i still want a BB Pearl. It is still in my wish list as a second phone. But only if they release an updated version of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be specific i just brought into your attention what was in the article.<br />
BB going down??? no. I believe its more like; they were having a fun ride on a Ford but android and iOS came on a Lamborghini and overtook them. They were having the fun just like Nokia until they realized that somebody has overtaken!!!<br />
Having said that i still want a BB Pearl. It is still in my wish list as a second phone. But only if they release an updated version of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti Retard</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/humorous-samsung-ad-touts-the-enterprise-security-of-their-safe-branded-galaxy-s-iii-and-note-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-704047</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti Retard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=43650#comment-704047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have a fair point but by this you imply that the torch wasn&#039;t clunky and the BB&#039;s released in like 2012 and late 2011 were clunky? 

Doesn&#039;t make sense that the company would go backwards (haven&#039;t followed BB much)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a fair point but by this you imply that the torch wasn&#8217;t clunky and the BB&#8217;s released in like 2012 and late 2011 were clunky? </p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t make sense that the company would go backwards (haven&#8217;t followed BB much)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sathaha</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/humorous-samsung-ad-touts-the-enterprise-security-of-their-safe-branded-galaxy-s-iii-and-note-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-704007</link>
		<dc:creator>Sathaha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=43650#comment-704007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;As clunky as current BlackBerry smartphones have become&quot;

Is your good old BB Torch CURRENT????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As clunky as current BlackBerry smartphones have become&#8221;</p>
<p>Is your good old BB Torch CURRENT????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mochamad Aris Zamroni</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/humorous-samsung-ad-touts-the-enterprise-security-of-their-safe-branded-galaxy-s-iii-and-note-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-703956</link>
		<dc:creator>Mochamad Aris Zamroni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=43650#comment-703956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you tlak security, device password cannot be erased by full software reinstall in Symbian devices. That is secure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you tlak security, device password cannot be erased by full software reinstall in Symbian devices. That is secure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magenta</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/humorous-samsung-ad-touts-the-enterprise-security-of-their-safe-branded-galaxy-s-iii-and-note-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-703936</link>
		<dc:creator>magenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=43650#comment-703936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[seems you&#039;re the one that not informed enough.
there&#039;s some Android devices that have the same level of security as Blackberry.

just google  &quot;samsung motorola fips certification&quot;.
you got the idea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seems you&#8217;re the one that not informed enough.<br />
there&#8217;s some Android devices that have the same level of security as Blackberry.</p>
<p>just google  &#8220;samsung motorola fips certification&#8221;.<br />
you got the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magenta</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/humorous-samsung-ad-touts-the-enterprise-security-of-their-safe-branded-galaxy-s-iii-and-note-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-703934</link>
		<dc:creator>magenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=43650#comment-703934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[no you&#039;re wrong.

Some Motorola and Samsung devices has FIPS certification, which means they has the same level of security as Blackberry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no you&#8217;re wrong.</p>
<p>Some Motorola and Samsung devices has FIPS certification, which means they has the same level of security as Blackberry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magenta</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/humorous-samsung-ad-touts-the-enterprise-security-of-their-safe-branded-galaxy-s-iii-and-note-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-703932</link>
		<dc:creator>magenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=43650#comment-703932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The safest device is Blackberry, Motorola, and some Samsung device.
Those have FIPS security certification.

You can easily google which smartphones has FIPS certification.

.
Apple, Nokia, Symbian, WinMo, WP, and others, has never received FIPS certification. They are not secure enough. Be careful when storing your sensitive data on these phones or OS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The safest device is Blackberry, Motorola, and some Samsung device.<br />
Those have FIPS security certification.</p>
<p>You can easily google which smartphones has FIPS certification.</p>
<p>.<br />
Apple, Nokia, Symbian, WinMo, WP, and others, has never received FIPS certification. They are not secure enough. Be careful when storing your sensitive data on these phones or OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti Retard</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/humorous-samsung-ad-touts-the-enterprise-security-of-their-safe-branded-galaxy-s-iii-and-note-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-703930</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti Retard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=43650#comment-703930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Software? No they weren&#039;t really targeted towards multi-media entertainment as other devices but did the business job just right

And BBM was PGDA until everyone decided to switch to Android and iOS 

Hardware? I agree on that.

BB wasn&#039;t great - agreed but it is in no way clunky IMO ... Honestly looking back torch was one of the best devices I have ever owned all the way in 2010]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Software? No they weren&#8217;t really targeted towards multi-media entertainment as other devices but did the business job just right</p>
<p>And BBM was PGDA until everyone decided to switch to Android and iOS </p>
<p>Hardware? I agree on that.</p>
<p>BB wasn&#8217;t great &#8211; agreed but it is in no way clunky IMO &#8230; Honestly looking back torch was one of the best devices I have ever owned all the way in 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grinmaster</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/humorous-samsung-ad-touts-the-enterprise-security-of-their-safe-branded-galaxy-s-iii-and-note-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-703927</link>
		<dc:creator>grinmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=43650#comment-703927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[just as Deonix said, you seems didn&#039;t have any clue.  honestly.
just replace &#039;Google&#039; in your comment with &#039;Apple&#039;, then it make more sense :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just as Deonix said, you seems didn&#8217;t have any clue.  honestly.<br />
just replace &#8216;Google&#8217; in your comment with &#8216;Apple&#8217;, then it make more sense :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
