<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smartphone king wanted: HTC One vs Sony Xperia Z vs Galaxy S III</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.gsmarena.com/htc-one-vs-sony-xperia-z-vs-galaxy-s-iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/htc-one-vs-sony-xperia-z-vs-galaxy-s-iii/</link>
	<description>GSMArena Blog: Geeks at large is a project of GSMArena.com team, discussing all things high-tech - mobile phones, computers, digcams and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muhammad Saad</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/htc-one-vs-sony-xperia-z-vs-galaxy-s-iii/comment-page-5/#comment-713512</link>
		<dc:creator>Muhammad Saad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=44807#comment-713512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[but I don&#039;t think so that using s4 chip and 600 would really make a difference in the real life use
a dual core krait is fast enough to do the every day tasks smoothly so a properly optimized quad core krait would be great...
my 2012 xperia s is fast enough to perform each and every task smoothly so Sony xperia Z would be great experience...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but I don&#8217;t think so that using s4 chip and 600 would really make a difference in the real life use<br />
a dual core krait is fast enough to do the every day tasks smoothly so a properly optimized quad core krait would be great&#8230;<br />
my 2012 xperia s is fast enough to perform each and every task smoothly so Sony xperia Z would be great experience&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karthik Kumar</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/htc-one-vs-sony-xperia-z-vs-galaxy-s-iii/comment-page-6/#comment-713476</link>
		<dc:creator>Karthik Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=44807#comment-713476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HTC beats out XperiaZ but Sony also has a 680x phone in the works that might well have the Snapdragon 8xx/6xx processor and match or surpass HTC One. And of course the big boy in the field, Galaxy S4 is launching soon.. Touch decision. But the HTC One is a looker for sure.

But given that HTC has locked bootloaders (unlock tool comes way late for sure) and Samsung is by far the modder community favourite, i&#039;m really torn. Will wait for GS4 to launch before taking a call. My trusty ye olde i9000 Galaxy S is getting rather long in the tooth even with Cyanogenmod 10.1 keeping it updated on 4.2.1]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HTC beats out XperiaZ but Sony also has a 680x phone in the works that might well have the Snapdragon 8xx/6xx processor and match or surpass HTC One. And of course the big boy in the field, Galaxy S4 is launching soon.. Touch decision. But the HTC One is a looker for sure.</p>
<p>But given that HTC has locked bootloaders (unlock tool comes way late for sure) and Samsung is by far the modder community favourite, i&#8217;m really torn. Will wait for GS4 to launch before taking a call. My trusty ye olde i9000 Galaxy S is getting rather long in the tooth even with Cyanogenmod 10.1 keeping it updated on 4.2.1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syed Arbab Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/htc-one-vs-sony-xperia-z-vs-galaxy-s-iii/comment-page-6/#comment-713399</link>
		<dc:creator>Syed Arbab Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=44807#comment-713399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sony is on the lead, and I have sony too but it is not Zzzzzzzz......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony is on the lead, and I have sony too but it is not Zzzzzzzz&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jahangir</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/htc-one-vs-sony-xperia-z-vs-galaxy-s-iii/comment-page-6/#comment-713328</link>
		<dc:creator>jahangir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=44807#comment-713328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[S3 released in 2012 but now htc one or xperia z released 2013 feb..if we compared these mobile samsung galaxy s3 still strong we can not deny it....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S3 released in 2012 but now htc one or xperia z released 2013 feb..if we compared these mobile samsung galaxy s3 still strong we can not deny it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sathaha</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/htc-one-vs-sony-xperia-z-vs-galaxy-s-iii/comment-page-5/#comment-713291</link>
		<dc:creator>Sathaha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=44807#comment-713291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes i will also choose Xperia Z. 

But thatttttttttt price:::::::::::::::]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes i will also choose Xperia Z. </p>
<p>But thatttttttttt price:::::::::::::::</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leyland</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/htc-one-vs-sony-xperia-z-vs-galaxy-s-iii/comment-page-5/#comment-713153</link>
		<dc:creator>Leyland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=44807#comment-713153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think S3 is dead yet to be honest and it wont be dead even after release of S4.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think S3 is dead yet to be honest and it wont be dead even after release of S4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leyland</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/htc-one-vs-sony-xperia-z-vs-galaxy-s-iii/comment-page-6/#comment-713152</link>
		<dc:creator>Leyland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=44807#comment-713152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s wait and see who will sell the most phones after S4 arrives on the scene!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s wait and see who will sell the most phones after S4 arrives on the scene!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RICHMAN SHAD</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/htc-one-vs-sony-xperia-z-vs-galaxy-s-iii/comment-page-6/#comment-713146</link>
		<dc:creator>RICHMAN SHAD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=44807#comment-713146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samsung galaxy s3 is best smartphone ever!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung galaxy s3 is best smartphone ever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeBody</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/htc-one-vs-sony-xperia-z-vs-galaxy-s-iii/comment-page-4/#comment-713114</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeBody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=44807#comment-713114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I still have a SE W890i and I&#039;m planning to upgrade to the EOS when it comes out. If you look below the surface it&#039;s easy to realize that the Nokia 808 is indeed one of the best piece of engineering to date. When I first held it in my hand for real (not watching some video), it felt like a quality product unlike the plastic toys other companies used to call smartphones. Nokia cared about all the little detail (where the glass and the body itself meet, the camera-platform on the other side, the shutter button. the lock-screen button etc...).

Being a computer enthusiast I found even the flagship phones to be just a bad joke (plastic lenses, videos are better when muted (wind effect and distortion are unbearable) cheap build quality, ultra-lame screens (I mean color reproduction, depth, response time and refreshing speed mainly), listening to music is only good for running, considering their audio chip (if they have such a thing at all) were all made to play youtube&#039;s 128kbps AAC, and android market is the worst of them all, I couldn&#039;t find a single app that was compatible with both the format (2007 MS Office .doc) and my Canon printer, not even mentioning what if I wanted to EDIT those documents).

The Nokia 808 was the first phone I would call a REAL product. Everything about it screams quality and that Nokia spent a lot of time in the making. Carl Zeiss lens, 1:2&quot; 41MP sensor with an imaging chip capable of handling  more than 1 Billion pixels per second, Oversampling algorithm, HAAC microphones, one of the best DAC in a smartphone, plays every videoformat, shoots real FullHD video (no low bitrate upscaled junk), true multitasking (can run 40+ apps simultaneously with zero lag) etc...

For me, the only smartphone I would call a flagship a product worth to buy is the Nokia 808 PureView.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I still have a SE W890i and I&#8217;m planning to upgrade to the EOS when it comes out. If you look below the surface it&#8217;s easy to realize that the Nokia 808 is indeed one of the best piece of engineering to date. When I first held it in my hand for real (not watching some video), it felt like a quality product unlike the plastic toys other companies used to call smartphones. Nokia cared about all the little detail (where the glass and the body itself meet, the camera-platform on the other side, the shutter button. the lock-screen button etc&#8230;).</p>
<p>Being a computer enthusiast I found even the flagship phones to be just a bad joke (plastic lenses, videos are better when muted (wind effect and distortion are unbearable) cheap build quality, ultra-lame screens (I mean color reproduction, depth, response time and refreshing speed mainly), listening to music is only good for running, considering their audio chip (if they have such a thing at all) were all made to play youtube&#8217;s 128kbps AAC, and android market is the worst of them all, I couldn&#8217;t find a single app that was compatible with both the format (2007 MS Office .doc) and my Canon printer, not even mentioning what if I wanted to EDIT those documents).</p>
<p>The Nokia 808 was the first phone I would call a REAL product. Everything about it screams quality and that Nokia spent a lot of time in the making. Carl Zeiss lens, 1:2&#8243; 41MP sensor with an imaging chip capable of handling  more than 1 Billion pixels per second, Oversampling algorithm, HAAC microphones, one of the best DAC in a smartphone, plays every videoformat, shoots real FullHD video (no low bitrate upscaled junk), true multitasking (can run 40+ apps simultaneously with zero lag) etc&#8230;</p>
<p>For me, the only smartphone I would call a flagship a product worth to buy is the Nokia 808 PureView.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superfly</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/htc-one-vs-sony-xperia-z-vs-galaxy-s-iii/comment-page-4/#comment-713085</link>
		<dc:creator>superfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=44807#comment-713085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow some of the things you pointed out are pointless like the carl zeiss lens , camera app and design.

But the rest of the stuff you mentioned is pretty cool I guess I was wrong to call it a one trick pony it&#039;s actually very decent except for the os.

But If the eos has these features that thing will rock although I wouldn&#039;t buy it cause I like android.

Maybe I was to quick to lump you in with all the other idiots on here you actually make some valid points wish more people on here had a brain.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow some of the things you pointed out are pointless like the carl zeiss lens , camera app and design.</p>
<p>But the rest of the stuff you mentioned is pretty cool I guess I was wrong to call it a one trick pony it&#8217;s actually very decent except for the os.</p>
<p>But If the eos has these features that thing will rock although I wouldn&#8217;t buy it cause I like android.</p>
<p>Maybe I was to quick to lump you in with all the other idiots on here you actually make some valid points wish more people on here had a brain.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
