Comments on: Face unlock for Samsung Galaxy S requires blinking, is better than ICS face unlock

By: MigRevil

MigRevil — Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:22:00 +0000

THOSE BLINKING EYES O.-

By: Via leb

Via leb — Sat, 07 Apr 2012 06:42:00 +0000

who are these 3 douchebags?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 31 Mar 2012 06:14:00 +0000

No no their unlock feature will surely start with an “i”, So hmm maybe “itch your head to unlock?????”.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:00:00 +0000

I have to say , blinking Idea is really great and also simple , really impressed how they solved it , ofc we cant do anything for video unlock.

And Google Unlock actually failed in conference demo itself , Google didnt pay attention while Samsung used little bit logic and enhanced the feature.

By: Ohgreatffs

Ohgreatffs — Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:54:00 +0000

Just lasy type a number :)

By: Maheshwara Reddy

Maheshwara Reddy — Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:16:00 +0000

the guys in the picture are blinking.. lol.. :)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:03:00 +0000

im just saying, noone use face unlock
like noone uses mms, or video calls or siri or common sense anymore
i dont see a future in face unlock and dont see the advantage over a 4digit code or a pattern

By: the_seba

the_seba — Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:33:00 +0000

This still sucks – the only viable option is to incorporate the heavy metal, teeth-showing facetwist whilst humming “Smoke on the water”. That’s what I call face unlock, and it looks insanely retarded too. Just imagine unlocking the phone in the middle of a business meeting. Cool!

By: Gaurav Kothari

Gaurav Kothari — Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:57:00 +0000

Nokia 3310 is still considered the best and easiest to use mobile phone !!!

By: Gaurav Kothari

Gaurav Kothari — Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:53:00 +0000

@a35af18e2a317e72c73cc3fbfebb3872:disqus : it is not about innovation, it is about manipulation

A simple idea has potential to change everythings