<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Desktop Ivy Bridge processors reportedly getting delayed again, this time until Q2 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.gsmarena.com/desktop-ivy-bridge-processors-reportedly-getting-delayed-again-this-time-until-q2-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/desktop-ivy-bridge-processors-reportedly-getting-delayed-again-this-time-until-q2-2012/</link>
	<description>GSMArena Blog: Geeks at large is a project of GSMArena.com team, discussing all things high-tech - mobile phones, computers, digcams and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will_prophets0001</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/desktop-ivy-bridge-processors-reportedly-getting-delayed-again-this-time-until-q2-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-598091</link>
		<dc:creator>Will_prophets0001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 04:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=23506#comment-598091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[no i3 ??? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no i3 ??? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darkangels6sic6</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/desktop-ivy-bridge-processors-reportedly-getting-delayed-again-this-time-until-q2-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-593768</link>
		<dc:creator>Darkangels6sic6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=23506#comment-593768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nearly 4.0Ghz at 8 cores and built in graphics at almost 1Ghz. Damn!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nearly 4.0Ghz at 8 cores and built in graphics at almost 1Ghz. Damn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/desktop-ivy-bridge-processors-reportedly-getting-delayed-again-this-time-until-q2-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-593566</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 09:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=23506#comment-593566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, those are unofficial specs so we can&#039;t be sure they are correct]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, those are unofficial specs so we can&#8217;t be sure they are correct</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: razec</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/desktop-ivy-bridge-processors-reportedly-getting-delayed-again-this-time-until-q2-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-593527</link>
		<dc:creator>razec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 05:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=23506#comment-593527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AMD doesn&#039;t want to fight Intel in the High Ends anymore, they&#039;ll be focusing on fusion for laptops and tablets so let the fight between Intel and Arm instead as Intel will be solely fighting for the existence of X86 which is being already being threatened by ARM. you can say Intel CPUs are fast as hell but ARM is already eating even the OS of choice for these CPUs and not long from now ARM will reach the point where full scale computing is now possible at MUCH LESS power consumption.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMD doesn&#8217;t want to fight Intel in the High Ends anymore, they&#8217;ll be focusing on fusion for laptops and tablets so let the fight between Intel and Arm instead as Intel will be solely fighting for the existence of X86 which is being already being threatened by ARM. you can say Intel CPUs are fast as hell but ARM is already eating even the OS of choice for these CPUs and not long from now ARM will reach the point where full scale computing is now possible at MUCH LESS power consumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PiRat</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/desktop-ivy-bridge-processors-reportedly-getting-delayed-again-this-time-until-q2-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-593480</link>
		<dc:creator>PiRat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=23506#comment-593480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Afshin3k3

Same reason why I am looking at the AMD 8150, price.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Afshin3k3</p>
<p>Same reason why I am looking at the AMD 8150, price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/desktop-ivy-bridge-processors-reportedly-getting-delayed-again-this-time-until-q2-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-593444</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=23506#comment-593444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you are right about power consumption but what i said was about circuit theory, I am sure you know it better, the electric length of a circuit must be very smaller than the wavelength otherwise it wont be a compact circuit ;) ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are right about power consumption but what i said was about circuit theory, I am sure you know it better, the electric length of a circuit must be very smaller than the wavelength otherwise it wont be a compact circuit ;) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeus</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/desktop-ivy-bridge-processors-reportedly-getting-delayed-again-this-time-until-q2-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-593437</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=23506#comment-593437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mobile CPUs should really benefit from Ivy Bridge (power consumption and better graphics). I would stick to a good desktop Sandy Bridge if I already have one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mobile CPUs should really benefit from Ivy Bridge (power consumption and better graphics). I would stick to a good desktop Sandy Bridge if I already have one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moo</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/desktop-ivy-bridge-processors-reportedly-getting-delayed-again-this-time-until-q2-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-593424</link>
		<dc:creator>Moo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=23506#comment-593424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i7 3770k has 100MHz more then the non k  but has the same turbo boost
maybe a typo error?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i7 3770k has 100MHz more then the non k  but has the same turbo boost<br />
maybe a typo error?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/desktop-ivy-bridge-processors-reportedly-getting-delayed-again-this-time-until-q2-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-593414</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=23506#comment-593414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, either higher frequency while using the same power or the same frequency using less power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, either higher frequency while using the same power or the same frequency using less power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.gsmarena.com/desktop-ivy-bridge-processors-reportedly-getting-delayed-again-this-time-until-q2-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-593402</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=23506#comment-593402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i dont think so, Phenom series are now more popular for gamers than intel ones.
AMDs are comparable with intel ones which are 50% or sometime 100% more expensive]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont think so, Phenom series are now more popular for gamers than intel ones.<br />
AMDs are comparable with intel ones which are 50% or sometime 100% more expensive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
