Comments on: Burn: Motorola targets the Galaxy S III in its latest RAZR HD ad

By: FormattedGerm

FormattedGerm — Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:20:00 +0000

Samsung should sue Motorola for this ad. Many people here are saying how Samsung does the same with the iPhone, but it’s completely different.
Those of you who watch the Samsung ads realise they never mention the iPhone’s name. So what Motorola have done is illegall

By: s mahapatra

s mahapatra — Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:22:00 +0000

Soory and morover motorola was the first to make the mobile phone and have brilliant voice clarity and loud .sound

By: smahapatra

smahapatra — Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:19:00 +0000

Saga

By: VERIONE

VERIONE — Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:50:00 +0000

hehe so many sgs3 haters.
envy??

By: Joselito Ando

Joselito Ando — Sun, 16 Dec 2012 02:04:00 +0000

the problem with moto is the design. tell me, was razor looks better than s3? give a break. i would be oppo find 5 for the design. only battery moto has done well. i dont know the UI, i think samsung has done quite better, well sony was excellent. if moto can just make design that would our eyes big, then their revenues might double in a couple of months.

By: Far_Ken

Far_Ken — Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:06:00 +0000

I have to agree, just bought a RAZR M, same processor as the HD. Side by side comparison with my SGS2…..no quicker. Claim that the screen size is the same….The GS2 screen doesn’t include soft keys, so the M is really only a 3.9″ screen. Ease of use….GS2 wins again, especially since you don’t have to worry about scrolling onto a setup screen. Battery life, the S2 gets double the battery life of the M.
End of the day the Razr M is sitting in a draw and I have gone back to the S2
Sorry a little off track.

The S3 LTE in Asian market is a quad core, sorry yanks you loose on that one along with Motorola.

By: Rudyno Nasrial

Rudyno Nasrial — Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:06:00 +0000

Does moto will sell RAZR HD or RAZR M in Indonesia?? does anybody know?? I’d really wait for this

By: Aanish Imtiaz

Aanish Imtiaz — Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:20:00 +0000

personally TBH both of these have crap designs, HTC and Sony have better but I pick the galaxy s3 because it has features that I need such as smart stay because on my old optimus 2x, the screen kept turning off when I was reading pdf’s, but smart stay only work in light and not darkness

By: Aanish Imtiaz

Aanish Imtiaz — Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:07:00 +0000

Dude I have it, You can’t say anything about samsung when don’t even have one (don’t even try to make up some fake story about owning the s3) I agree with you on the build quality (kinda on design aswell but samsung has better design than most) plus samsung has better internals and better speed and much better features such as samsung dive, all share play, smart stay, S beam and many many more PS you can’t judge the design because everyone has different opinions, plus popularity does matter, I don’t need to explain why unless your a stupid 6 yr old

By: esa

esa — Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:32:00 +0000

, you’ll see that it’s got quite less apps than Android.

yeah 80% of android is trashy apps and 20% of the other 40% is buged
and also you will use the rest 20% on a buged os

you have only 10 GB only ( you cant install the apps in sd card) (s3 note 2)

look at the apps comments in play store
they giving 5 stars to the apps and saying ( not working)

you really think playstore is better than appstore ? you are wrong