Comments on: 16MP Android-running Kodak Polaroid SC1630 hands-on photos http://blog.gsmarena.com/16mp-android-running-kodak-polaroid-sc1630-hands-on-photos/ GSMArena Blog: Geeks at large is a project of GSMArena.com team, discussing all things high-tech - mobile phones, computers, digcams and more... Tue, 21 May 2013 07:28:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Bah http://blog.gsmarena.com/16mp-android-running-kodak-polaroid-sc1630-hands-on-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-697286 Bah Tue, 08 Jan 2013 05:08:00 +0000 http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=25442#comment-697286 your image gallery is the pinnacle of tech
#heavilydrippingwithsarcasm

]]> By: boom! http://blog.gsmarena.com/16mp-android-running-kodak-polaroid-sc1630-hands-on-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-601152 boom! Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:16:00 +0000 http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=25442#comment-601152 looks nothing like it!! The ios one  is just the lens this one is the actual camera! omg why do people compare everything with ios when there is OTHER os’s out there! 

]]> By: J.Espoir http://blog.gsmarena.com/16mp-android-running-kodak-polaroid-sc1630-hands-on-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-600743 J.Espoir Fri, 13 Jan 2012 04:30:00 +0000 http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=25442#comment-600743 can’t go too far, samsung few years ago got a phone with optical soon too, but never see it in the market
also the battery life is an issue,
but hope it could do well 

]]> By: Darkangels6sic6 http://blog.gsmarena.com/16mp-android-running-kodak-polaroid-sc1630-hands-on-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-600613 Darkangels6sic6 Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:56:00 +0000 http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=25442#comment-600613 It definitely has draw back, but will probably be one of the best camera phones out there. Maybe even the best. Also like the classic design. If they had only put in some nicer phone features.

]]> By: Darkangels6sic6 http://blog.gsmarena.com/16mp-android-running-kodak-polaroid-sc1630-hands-on-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-600612 Darkangels6sic6 Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:54:00 +0000 http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=25442#comment-600612 Looking classic and cheap are two different things

]]> By: Cristian Spiterik http://blog.gsmarena.com/16mp-android-running-kodak-polaroid-sc1630-hands-on-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-600558 Cristian Spiterik Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:08:00 +0000 http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=25442#comment-600558 I don’t use my phone for the camera so this hardly interests me, but I think th ephone doesn’t look nice at all, the buttons look ugly, and there’s a lot of wasted space at the bottom. I hope this phone has decent specs though, like dual-core and Ice Cream Sandwich, and an unlocked bootloader :)

]]> By: Mobilefreak http://blog.gsmarena.com/16mp-android-running-kodak-polaroid-sc1630-hands-on-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-600546 Mobilefreak Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:46:00 +0000 http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=25442#comment-600546 I wonder how the image and video quality are compared to current camphones like Nokia N8…

Are there any examples pics / vids ?

]]> By: Ming http://blog.gsmarena.com/16mp-android-running-kodak-polaroid-sc1630-hands-on-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-600540 Ming Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:15:00 +0000 http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=25442#comment-600540 @024b9b9110219f772c1530eea893ef51:disqus  The only Android phone with Xenon other than Altek is the Motorola Milestone XT720 and XT701

]]> By: Alex http://blog.gsmarena.com/16mp-android-running-kodak-polaroid-sc1630-hands-on-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-600532 Alex Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:38:00 +0000 http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=25442#comment-600532 i undertand you perfectly, i am in the same situation here with my Sony Ericsson Satio. Greate camera, super-nice pictures, mode then decent, but an awful OS, with bugs (even in camera mode sometimes, but rarely), and a bad batery life. Looking farward for an android xenon flash good camera phone!

]]> By: Alex http://blog.gsmarena.com/16mp-android-running-kodak-polaroid-sc1630-hands-on-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-600531 Alex Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:35:00 +0000 http://blog.gsmarena.com/?p=25442#comment-600531 indeed

]]>